I need some sales if I'm going to stay in business.  Please place orders via the affiliate links on this web site.  It's the same price.  If you bookmark or type in the URL, I don't get credit for the sale.  The easiest way is just to bookmark any of my web pages and order from that.  If the links don't work, it could be your spyware.  I recommend Windows DefenderClick here to address concerns about using credit cards via the Internet.
QualityCounts.com
   Comprehensive Anti-aging Research
Home iHerb Vitacost Int Antiaging Sys Prescriptions Life Extension Products drugstore.com OffshoreRX Contact
QualityCounts.com sent this email to you because you subscribed at http://qualitycounts.com/maillist.htm. If you do not want to receive further mailings, click here to unsubscribe Click here for past newsletters.

Recent Longevity News for the seven days ending 5/7/08.  You should consult your doctor if you are taking any medications.

Many Depressed Older Adults Lack Vitamin D - WebMD, 5/6/08 - "Researchers reporting in the May issue of Archives of General Psychiatry have linked low blood levels of vitamin D -- the "sunshine vitamin" -- and increased parathyroid hormone levels to depression among older adults" - See vitamin D products at iHerb.

Ibuprofen May Cut Alzheimer's Risk - WebMD, 5/5/08 - "Use of ibuprofen pain relievers like Advil and Motrin for more than five years reduced Alzheimer's risk by 44% in a study reported in the May issue of Neurology"

CoQ10 may cut muscle injuries for athletes - Nutra USA, 5/5/08 - "The volunteers had daily training sessions of five and a half hours per day for six days during the intervention period. At day three and five of the six day training period, the researchers report that both groups experienced increased in serum creatine kinase activity and the concentration of myoglobin, but these increases were significantly lower in the group receiving the CoQ10 supplements ... Elevated levels of the enzyme are indicative of muscle damage and injury ... levels of lipid peroxide, a marker of oxidative stress, were also lower in the CoQ10 group after three and five days of training" - [Abstract] - See Coenzyme Q10 products at iHerb.

Vitamin D3 for 1 Year Is Safe in Adolescents - Medscape, 5/5/08 - "Vitamin D3 at doses equivalent to 2000 IU/day for 1 year is safe in adolescents and results in desirable vitamin D levels"

Your Keyboard: Dirtier Than a Toilet - ABC News, 5/5/08 - "It turns out that your computer keyboard could put a host of potentially harmful bacteria -- including E. coli and staph -- quite literally at your fingertips ... one had levels of germs five times higher than that found on the toilet seat" - Note:  I put my keyboard in the dishwasher every once in a while.  It takes about a week before it will work again but I haven't had any go bad yet.  I've got several keyboards from old computers so I don't care if I lose one.  Also see Unotron Washable Corded Standard Keyboard S5000K-B - Keyboard - PS/2, USB - black.  I would think that if the regular keyboards worked in the dishwasher, these would also.  If you want to use those old keyboards you'll probably need an adapter like the Adesso PS/2 to USB Adapter, connects 2 PS/2 connectors to 1 USB port/hub (ADP-PU21 ).

HDL Cholesterol Linked to Lower Extremity Performance in Elderly - Medscape, 5/2/08 - "HDL-C levels were significantly associated with all indices of function ... participants with the highest HDL-C levels having the best physical performance"

Inflammatory Markers and Albuminuria Independently Predict Heart Failure - Medscape, 5/2/08 - "Interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein, and macroalbuminuria are significant predictors of congestive heart failure, independent of obesity and other established risk factors" - Also see my inflammation page for ways to reduce it.

Juicing may boost a fruit's antioxidant punch: study - Nutra USA, 5/2/08 - "The juices also outperformed the fruit for protecting against atherosclerosis, measured by the aortic fatty streak lesion area or AFSA. This value was reduced by 93 and 78 per cent for the purple grape juice and the fruit, respectively, and by 60 and 48 per cent for apple juice and apple, respectively ... The results show for the first time that long-term consumption of antioxidants supplied by apple and purple grape, especially phenolic compounds, prevents the development of atherosclerosis in hamsters, and that processing can have a major impact on the potential health benefits of a product" - [Abstract]

Fast-Food Liver Damage Can Be Reversed, Experts Say - Science Daily, 4/30/08 - "Diets high in fast food can be highly toxic to the liver and other internal organs, but that damage can be reversed ... You can likely reverse the damage to your liver and other vital organs if you simply give up the unhealthy lifestyle"

Daily Aspirin May Cut Breast Cancer Risk - WebMD, 4/30/08 - "Overall, NSAID use wasn't associated with breast cancer risk. But women who reported taking daily aspirin were 16% less likely to develop estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer. Those tumors are fueled by estrogen; most breast cancers are estrogen-receptor positive"

Regular Exercise Through Middle Age May Delay Biological Aging - Medscape, 4/29/08 - "Review of the available evidence suggests that a regular program of aerobic exercise can slow or reverse functional deterioration, lowering biological age by at least 10 years, and potentially prolonging independence by a similar amount"

Adiponectin Levels Indicative of Diabetes Risk - Medscape, 4/29/08 - "Baseline levels of adiponectin are inversely related to diabetes risk in subjects at high risk for developing the condition"

Low Vitamin D, High CRP Linked to Poorer Function in Heart Failure Patients - Medscape, 4/28/08 - "Lower vitamin D levels and higher C-reactive protein levels are associated with poor aerobic capacity and greater frailty in elderly patients with heart failure"

Abstracts from this week's Doctor's Guide Nutrition/Dietetics plus abstracts from my RSS feeds (Click here for the journals, the PubMed ones at the top):

Does the level of prostate cancer risk affect cancer prevention with finasteride? - Urology. 2008 May;71(5):854-7 - "Finasteride significantly reduced prostate cancer risk for all risk quintiles. For quintiles 1 through 5, odds ratios were 0.72, 0.52, 0.64, 0.66, and 0.71, respectively" - See finasteride at OffshoreRX.com.

Elevated white blood cell count is associated with arterial stiffness - Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 May 2 - "These findings indicate that elevated WBC count is associated with arterial stiffness"

Reducing exercise-induced muscular injury in kendo athletes with supplementation of coenzyme Q10 - Br J Nutr. 2008 Feb 20;:1-7 - "Subjects in the CoQ10 group took 300 mg CoQ10 per d for 20 d ... These results indicate that CoQ10 supplementation reduced exercise-induced muscular injury in athletes" - See Coenzyme Q10 products at iHerb.

In vivo and in vitro regulation of syndecan 1 in prostate cells by N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids - J Biol Chem. 2008 Apr 30 - "These findings indicate that syndecan 1 is upregulated by n-3 fatty acids by a transcriptional pathway involving PPARgamma. This mechanism may contribute to the chemopreventive properties of n-3 fatty acids in prostate cancer" - See Mega Twin EPA at iHerb.

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and the Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease. Results from NHANES 2001 to 2004 - Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008 Apr 16 - "After multivariable adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, physical activity level, and laboratory measures, the prevalence ratio of PAD for the lowest, compared to the highest, 25(OH)D quartile (<17.8 and >/=29.2 ng/mL, respectively) was 1.80 (95% confidence interval: 1.19, 2.74). For each 10 ng/mL lower 25(OH)D level, the multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio of PAD was 1.35 (95% confidence interval: 1.15, 1.59). CONCLUSIONS: Low serum 25(OH)D levels are associated with a higher prevalence of PAD"

Phenolics from purple grape, apple, purple grape juice and apple juice prevent early atherosclerosis induced by an atherogenic diet in hamsters - Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008 Apr;52(4):400-7 - "The results show for the first time that long-term consumption of antioxidants supplied by apple and purple grape, especially phenolic compounds, prevents the development of atherosclerosis in hamsters, and that processing can have a major impact on the potential health benefits of a product. The underlying mechanism is related mainly to increased antioxidant status and improved serum lipid profile"

Neat Tech Stuff:

There was a segment on the San Diego local news regarding natural gas powered Honda Civics. They claim the equivalent comes to $1.25 per gallon as does the Jay Leno video.  Both the Fox6 video and Leno video claim $1.25 per gallon equivalent but I think they are talking about the home units because the SDG&E plump says $2.67 per gallon equivalent put Poway Unified School has a pubic pump measured in therms at $2.00 per therm.  I calculate that to be $1.75 per equivalent gallon which seemed about right for the mileage (1 gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE) = 114,118.8 BTU's = 1.14 Therms).  I bought the last 2008 that my local dealer had because someone cancelled out.  The price is around $25000 however that price is very practical when you look at a few things.  First there is a $4,000 federal voucher off you federal taxes.  That's a voucher not a deduction so that brings the cost down to $21,000.  Plus I was only getting 25 MPG with my Ford Focus.  With a previous Escort I was getting 33 MPG.  I'm figuring 30 MPG with the Honda.  I did the math figuring how many miles I've averaged per week, per month and per year since I bought the car and calculated the savings on gas to be $1560 per year.  That's adds up to $7800 over a five year period.  If you subtract that from the $21,00 it brings it down to $13,200 but it's probably better than that.  I used to live in Coronado, CA but now live in North County.  Anyone familiar with San Diego knows that people in North County put on a lot more miles.  If you figured I averaged 50 per week less in Coronado and 50 miles more per week in North County (8.3 miles more per day in North County) which is probably what I'm driving now the 5 year cost savings on gas would bring it down to $11,700.

On two tank full's I averaged about 35 miles per gallon on mostly highway driving.  The sticker says 24 city, 36 highway but I've never gotten anywhere close to those numbers with any other car.  (35 - 25)/25 = 40% more mileage than my Focus.  I used to get high test (called premium for the younger generation) for the Focus for at $4 per gallon.  So even without the lower price of natural gas, that's $16 less than the Focus for a 10 gallon fill up but high test is $4.12 now so it's even better.  Figuring $1.75 per equivalent gallon of natural gas and $4.12 per gallon for high test gas and using 40% better gas mile the savings would be ($4.12 - $1.75) * 10 * 1.4 = $33.18 per 10 gallon fill up but if the home refueling unit brings the cost of natural gas down to $1.25 it would be ($4.12 - $1.25) * 10 * 1.4 = $40.18 per ten gallon fill up.  If you used that 10 gallons per week (250 miles per week in my Focus) it would come to $40.18 * 52 = $2089.36 saving per year for the Honda natural gas at 35 MPG over the Focus at 25 MPG.  That's $10,446.80 over ten years so you can see how the savings can add up.  I think there must have been something wrong with the Focus that I only got 25 MPG though.  Whatever it was, it may have souped up the carburetor because it had the power of at least a 6 cylinder.  That $2089.36 savings per year would take $174.11 off the monthly payments.

The Leno video claimed that refueling from your home cost $1.00 to $1.25 per gallon equivalent and that having a home refueler locked you in at the baseline rate.  I tried to get some hard numbers on that.  Click here for my last San Diego Gas & Electric bill.  I couldn't figure it out but the bottom line is that 38 therms came to $54.61.  $54.61/38 = $1.43 per therm.  $1.43/1.14 = $1.26 per gallon.  So those public natural gas pumps must be making a killing with their markup.  Maybe that will come down as competition picks up.

There is a natural gas trip planner on the Internet.  If I went to Las Vegas I'd have to get fuel in Barstow and then Las Vegas has several places.  As far as Los Angeles, I could make it there and back on a tank easily plus there are several places in LA plus you can print out the gas stations from the Internet and put them in the GPS and find them easily.  San Diego has only 11 refueling stations but one is only about 2 miles away but I wouldn't need it with the garage refueler.  Another problem is that you only get about 225 miles on a tank.  The problem in San Diego is that they are sold out until the 2009 models in September.

It's estimated that demand will outpace supply of oil by the year 2023.  I would think that the US would have to start switching to an alternative at least 5 years prior to that.  I don't see any other option than natural gas.  With bio-fuel it used to take more gas to produce it than what you got.  Now it's a little less but not much.  They keep saying that they can get it down to something like .3 gallons per 1 gallon produced but I don't see it happening at the rate their going.  It seems like the people saying that are the ones getting paid to do the research.  Plus one of the reasons the price of food is going though the roof is because of the crops being used for bio-fuel.  Plus Time Magazine is saying that bio-fuel might even make global warming worse.  Plus I believe that we will run out of fresh water to grow enough bio-fuel.  Plus bio-fuel thickens at low temperatures kind of like when you put olive oil in the refrigerator.  Yeah, you can heat the fuel tanks but that's even more energy and another obstacle.  Yeah, I read about the Jatropha plant years ago.  It's supposed to grow nearly anywhere with very little water.  They know the numbers don't add up on that so they argue that they can grow it in poor countries and pay low wage to pick Jatropha seeds.  Sounds like code for the equivalent of childhood sweat shops paying kids 3 cents per day so people can run their SUVs.  It might be outside but it's just as hot.  I was going to buy stock in the main company producing it but had second thoughts the more I read.  If it was viable, why are we wasting our time with corn and soy?  Just doing rough calculations there is no way the numbers ad up.  I calculate that Jatropha will yield 5600 gallons per square mile per year (Slide 13 and doing the math).  There are 3,537,441 square miles in the United States.  So if planted every inch of the US, which is impossible with the lakes, road, building, etc., you would get 19,809,669,600.  So let's say 20 * 109.  Then let's say 200 million people in the US average 20 gallons per week.  That's 208 * 109. (that's less that the 284 * 109 that this site claims is the actual number in 2002 which shows how close my guestimates are).  That's still less than a tenth of what we need, probably about a twentieth of what we need growing every inch of the United States with Jatropha which is impossible.  Even with 8th grade math the numbers don't come anywhere near adding up.  You can't grow the equivalent of millions of years of dead dinosaurs.

When we switch, I don't know why anyone would go with hydrogen when I'm betting the natural gas cars will be a lot cheaper and will cost less than half to fuel compared to hydrogen.  I'm putting my money on it with my Honda GX and investing in the Phill natural gas refueler for my garage.  I called the cassette/8 track war (you really have to be old to remember that one) then VHS / beta war (at least we're up to the '80's).  I called CD's so fast that I went out and bought a player and it was a good two years before there was any kind of selection.  I was starting to wonder if I could have been wrong on that one.  Then Blue Ray / HD DVD war.  I'm calling natural gas as my bet on the automobile alternative energy war.  Hydrogen might be sustainable but I'll bet it will be 40 years before it is price competitive again natural gas plus it seems like we are already behind the eight ball in planning power plants to produce it.

There are so many problems with hydrogen that I don't see it happening in my lifetime.  First of all, it takes up so much space that the only practical way is to compress it into a liquid.  To get hydrogen from water into liquid hydrogen requires a tremendous amount of energy.  Where is that energy going to come from unless they increase the amount of nuclear power plants by at least 30 times?  Plus fuel cells require a rare metal which will become even more rare if we start producing fuel cells.  They keep saying that we should be able to find a substitute but what if they can't.  Plus the hydrogen atom is so small nothing will hold it completely.  The best they've been able to do is still losing 1.7% per day / 51% per month or half a tank due to leakage.  That's a huge loss in energy everyday when you figure the total number of cars for something that already required a huge amount of energy to produce.  Plus that's just not half a tank for you it's all the way down the line.  For example, if the gas station has a 30,000 storage tank and loses half that a month.  If the oil companies try to store liquid hydrogen in those huge storage tanks, not only will they need to be four times as large or four times as many to hold the same amount of energy but they will lose half that capacity every month.  Plus the tanks to hold liquid hydrogen are going to cost way more than the ones that currently hold petroleum.  You can see how fast that loss can add up and how that could add to the price.  If we are going to come up with the nuclear reactors to produce all that hydrogen we are already late.  It takes something  like 12 years to get them on line.

From what I've read, solar energy cost about 3.5 times today's current rates. That might be an option to produce hydrogen but can anyone think of increase their home utility bill by 350%?  With solar panels it takes 4.5 year just to get the energy back that it took to manufacture them.  Those people you see on TV that claim they are saving money are doing some kind of voodoo math.  I got prices from a San Diego dealer when I was president of a homeowners association and did the math and there was no way it even came close to be cost effective.

I read one article that claimed wind power was only about 10% higher than today's rates so that might be a better option is you can install enough of them but that's something that will take many many years. However, an article I read a few years ago said that wind cost 40 cents per kilowatt which is about a 10 times higher.

Electric cars are a joke.  Every time you change energy from one form to another you lose a large percentage.  With electric cars you start with chemical energy in the form of natural gas at the electrical generation plant.  Then you change it to heat energy (combustion) to turn the turbine generator (kinetic energy) which turns it into electrical energy which goes through wires (more energy loss) which charges the car batteries (chemical energy again?) then back to electrical then back to kinetic energy to move the car (I count 6 conversions).  With natural gas you're just going from chemical to heat to kinetic energy (2 conversions).  That's got to be more total energy plus you're just moving the pollution from the highway to the power plant.

We've got enough natural gas to last 250 years.  If we start using it for transportation it will probably cut that down to about 30 years but that's still 30 years of bought time.  In the mean time people need to rid their love of the SUV and start using Energy Star products and energy efficient bulbs.  Hopefully they will figure a way to produce energy with fusion but that may never happen.  Plus natural gas primarily consists of methane and methane is the primary cause of global warming.  It seems like they could increase that 30 years substantially by harvesting methane from animal and human waist.  You're not going to extend it indefinitely.  Just eye balling it one movement per day is not going to power my car for a day.  Methane is 20 times more powerful than carbon dioxide as far has global warming so harvesting it and turning it back into carbon dioxide and water by using it as fuel would seem to cut down on global warming by a factor of 20.  Cutting down on something by a factor of 20 that would have ended up in the atmosphere anyway sounds like a better option than even zero global warming fuels.  The bottom line is that I feel natural gas will win as the alternative fuel source for anyone old enough to be reading this newsletter.

Everyone wants to blame high oil prices on those evil capitalist oil companies.  Those oil companies have about an 11% profit margin.  That’s about a third of what Microsoft is.  How much profit do people think the oil companies are authorized?  Yeah, 9% would be better but do people really think that 2% off the wholesale price is going to make a difference?  Maybe we should deny the oil companies any profit at all so that there will be no incentive to find more cost effective ways to do things and gas would be even higher.  Better yet there wouldn't even be any incentive to find oil.  Then we could do like the old Russia and send the company presidents' families to Siberia if they don't find oil.  Yeah, that's the ticket.  People that think there's a better system might want to looks at the price of gas in other countries that import their oil.  I don't know why so many people are in denial that we're running out of oil and I don't know why there is so many paranoid schizophrenics that think everything is a conspiracy.  The problem is not the oil companies, it’s that we are running out of oil and despite the snow job on alternative energy there are no solutions that are even close to being easy.  Those people should be criticizing people with SUVs and people who are still using incandescent bulbs and people who aren’t buying Energy Star.  Yeah, oil companies make billions but that’s because 11% of a lot of money is still a lot of money.  These are huge companies.  Politicians who criticize and claim they have a magic fix are lying.  Tapping our oil reserves will just make things worse further down the line plus there's only 58 days worth in the reserves putting us in a really bad position if there's another embargo.  Those of us in the '70's remember the gas lines.  I was in college and remember studying while waiting in the lines.  At least you were usually able to get it if you waited long enough and it was an odd or even day according to your license plate and they didn't run out while you were in line.

It sure doesn't seem like our leaders have all this calculated out.  They haven't even eyeballed it or they would see what a terrible situation we are going to be in in a couple years if they don't come up with the power plants to produce all this hydrogen.

I feel I'm at least doing something by plugging natural gas cars.  Whatever alternative fuel we go with, wasteful use is still going to hurt our environment even if it's hydrogen produced my nuclear energy.  You still end up with the nuclear waste.  Plus we shouldn't build anymore nuclear reactors than what we can barely get by on.

I'm not an expert on alternative energy.  All the above is basic stuff yet the overwhelming majority of people are not even acutely aware of the problems.  I feel there is a bad moon rising with the energy crisis and no one's paying attention.  I worry that world leaders have hugely underestimated the cost of a hydrogen economy and that when we are forced to switch those costs will put us in a world depression worse than that of the '30's.  For that reason I question whether it should be legal to be wasting petroleum on SUVs and travel homes getting 4 miles per gallon.  It took the government this long to figure out that bio-fuel wouldn't work something that should have been obvious from the beginning based on fresh water along.

I took this picture to email the guy giving the Phill estimate because I wasn’t going to be home when he came to look at it.    I’ve already gotten on my roommate’s case about that SUV:

Health Focus (Whole Grains):

Abstracts:

 

Past newsletters

Disclaimer: These products and all information contained on this website is for educational purposes only. These products must be used in conjunction with any and all local, state and federal laws. It is up to the end user to comply with all legal guidelines, thus we are not and will not be held responsible for any misuse of this product or any damages that it may cause.

Medical Disclaimer:  Information provided is for educational purposes only.  The views represented are those of the participants.  This website makes no claims or representation regarding treatment, cure, or mitigation of disease.  Consult your doctor, practitioner, and/or pharmacist for any health problem and before using any supplements or before making any changes in prescribed medications.  If you are ill, we recommend you see a qualified health professional.  Statements about products and health conditions have not been evaluated by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration.

Google
WWW QualityCounts.com